HE roaring din for self determination currently rocking the
nation and demands for restructuring to stem the tide, yesterday rang high at
the Umaru Musa Yar’Adua Memorial Hall, Kaduna. A rare assemblage of leaders
of northern extraction, including President Muhammadu Buhari dissected the sore
issue and tacitly sought for a less costly means of dousing the flame. They
spoke at the memorial conference in honour of former military governor of the
defunct northern region, the late General Hassan Usman Katsina. Buhari urged
Nigerians to make use of the 1999 constitution to fight for their rights,
instead of toeing the line of illegality in their agitations
The president spoke as special guest of honour.
He stressed that the constitution contains all necessary
portions that guarantee the rights the people should enjoy.
Buhari who was represented by the Minister of Interior,
Abdulraman Dambazau added that Nigerians, particularly northerners, should
emulate the virtues of General Katsina.
He said, “Nigeria has come a long way as a democratic
nation. So the rights of all Nigerians are in the 1999 Constitution. They
must abide by the constitution to achieve whatever goals.
“I call on all elected persons to give good governance to
the people, Nigerians deserve good governance.
“My leadership is improving on security, fighting
corruption; Boko Haram insurgency has been brought under control.
“We must unite as a nation for national integration;
emulate virtues of late General Hassan Usman Katsina.”
Former vice president, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar hit the nail
on the head when he said that it will be better for Nigeria to be restructured
than to go to war with the various agitating groups in the country before
allowing them to realize such agitations. Atiku, who has been consistent in his
call for restructuring contended that “whether we like or support it or not,
restructuring will eventually happen in Nigeria.”
He further canvassed the idea that, to either restructure or
allow the agitators have their way in a peaceful manner, a National Conference
should be convened by the Federal Government to allow every part of the
country come to a roundtable to negotiate how to go their separate ways as
brothers and sisters doing business together in the environment.
He spoke on the topic, “The challenges of national
integration and survival of democracy in Nigeria”. Dwelling more on national
integration, the former vice president, and twice presidential aspirant
described it as the process by which different components of a country, with economic,
political and cultural links, develop a sense of nationhood, of unity, of
oneness, of interdependence, irrespective of their different histories,
experiences, ideologies, and cultural values and practices. He, however,
regretted that “as a country we have mightily struggled to live up to this
ideal. We have obviously not done enough to realize national integration, and
the survival of our democracy is still a work in progress. The cost to us has
been enormous. We even fought a civil war to forcibly keep the country
together.” Reviewing the pervading socio-political climate, he observed “that
different segments of Nigeria’s population have, at different times and
sometimes at the same time, expressed feelings of marginalization, of being
short- changed dominated, oppressed, threatened, or even targeted for
elimination.” These agitations and misgivings, according to him have always
been met with various measures which include “ the creation of states from the
earlier three(and later four)regions to the current 36 states; a civil war,
and other military operations in different parts of the country at different
times; federal character principle; changes to revenue allocation formulae,
National Youth Service Corps; federal takeover or establishment and
management of schools, universities, hospitals, and huge federal presence in
the economy as an investor. Others include the excessive centralization and
concentration of power at the federal level and the weakening of the federating
states; and amnesty for repentant ex- militants of the Niger Delta. He said
these measures have failed woefully, leading to a fragile unity, unstable
democracy and more grievances. Atiku blamed the failure of the policies on
“sectional interests and sentiments.” Accusing the Nigerian state of inflicting
conflicting policies on the people, Atiku cited the requirement of state and
local government of origin rather than residency for access to government
services and jobs.
He blamed the pervading belief among many Nigerians that the
greatest beneficiary of the status quo is the North on their knee- jack
resistance to calls for restructuring, the reliance on oil revenue which comes
from outside the North, the leading role it played in the civil war, and
northerners being the heads of government at the national level for much of the
post independence period until 1999, during which period much of the current
structure was put in place. He deplored the pervading poverty in the North, the
bankruptcy of most of the states that depend on federal allocation to survive,
alarming school dropouts, dwindling agricultural output, and obsolete way of
herding in the 21st century as some of the ills plaguing the North. He
emphasized the inevitability of restructuring the country, saying
“The question is whether it will happen around a conference
table, in a direction influenced by us and whether we will be an equal partner
in the process. Or will it happen in a more unpredictable arena and in a manner
over which we have little influence? It should be at a table and we need to be
at that table.
“A nation is an organism; it grows, it evolves, it changes,
it adapts. And like other organisms if it does not adapt, it dies.”
Expatiating further on restructuring, Atiku said; “those who argue that
restructuring of the polity won’t be necessary once we diversify the economy
are mistaken.
“As long as the Federal Government remains overly dominant
relative to the federating states, it will continue to matter which section of
the country captures federal power with its attendant instability.
“And as long as the Federal Government keeps the bulk of oil
revenues for itself, its desire and will to provide the leadership needed to
diversify the economy will continue to be limited.”
He extolled the virtues of the late Usman Katsina and the
role he played in fostering the nation’s unity, regretting that his efforts in
that direction should not be in vain, because Nigeria’s unity is currently
under severe stress. Calling on statesmen to rise up to the challenge and
proffer solutions, he said “We cannot tell a person who says he feels pain that
he does not feel pain.”
This was even as former military head of state, retired
General Yakubu Gowon, who was the chairman on the occasion said that the
Nigerian military did not see Biafran fighters during the war as enemies, but
rebels fighting a cause they believed was right.
Gowon said it was this perception of seeing them as rebels
rather than enemies that forced the Federal Government to integrate the
Biafrans into the federal system without a carryover of animosity.
In his speech, a former vice chancellor of Ahmadu Bello
University, (ABU) Zaria, Professor Ango Abdullahi said the northern region can
no longer guarantee the unity of the country because, it has paid its dues in
doing so since the era of the premier of the North and Sardauna of Sokoto, Sir
Ahmadu Bello.
He said those Nigerians who are saying that Nigeria can’t be
divided are actually making a mistake, stressing that the country is very
divisible in the face of current avalanche of agitations and separatist
tendencies.